WMD proliferation: A tighter net

by Rory Medcalf - 6 August 2009 10:07AM

Today is Hiroshima Day, and a strengthened regime to stop nuclear proliferation-related shipments is an essential part of wider efforts to ensure nuclear weapons are never used again.

A policy brief published today by the Lowy Institute calls on Australia and other countries to redouble their efforts to fix serious gaps in an international arrangement to stop maritime shipments of materials destined for weapons of mass destruction (WMD) programs.

The report argues that heightened concerns over North Korea provide an opportunity to bolster the Proliferation Security Initiative (PSI), a 95-country arrangement to promote interception of transfers of cargoes related to weapons of mass destruction (WMD). Media reports this week raising concerns about Burma’s possible nuclear activities add to the urgency of strengthening PSI’s Asian coverage in particular.

In A Tighter Net: Strengthening the Proliferation Security Initiative, non-proliferation scholar Emma Belcher notes that PSI relies on participating states and their domestic laws, yet some key states remain outside, including China, India, Pakistan, South Africa, Egypt, Indonesia and Malaysia. They question its legitimacy and transparency. And within PSI, information-sharing is limited. 

To address these problems, Emma recommends that:

  • Participants should redouble efforts to recruit missing states by persuading them of the PSI’s legitimacy and providing incentives. These could include legal and operational capacity-building, plus a mechanism to share information. 
  • Australia should take a lead in bringing more Asian countries on board, beginning with Indonesia and Malaysia. 
  • Australia should also renew efforts to urge the US to ratify the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), which would reinforce the legitimacy of US-led maritime operations. PSI states could strengthen the legality of interdictions by pushing the limits of Article 27 of UNCLOS.

This piece makes it clear that a stronger Australian role in PSI would be consistent with the Rudd Government’s aspiration for Australia to be an active middle power with expanded maritime reach. If Canberra is looking for something practical to do to reduce nuclear dangers in the region and the world – something beyond its nuclear disarmament commission – then this could well be it.

Photo by Flickr user (stephan), used under a Creative Commons license.

Lowy Institute for International Policy
Australia in the Asian Century

An Interpreter feature which ran from March to September of 2012, published to debate the Gillard Government's 'Australia in the Asian Century' White Paper, then in its research and consultation phase. Click here to see every post published in this series.

For commentary on the published White Paper, click here.

Australia's Defence Challenges

An Interpreter feature exploring Australia's defence challenges as the 2013 Defence White Paper planning process begins. Click here to see every post published in this series.

Selected Interpreter posts also appear in:

 
Business Spectator Caing online The Diplomat
 

Keep up-to-date with The Interpreter through:

iPhone App   iPhone App

RSS Feed   The Interpreter RSS Feed

Email Digest  

To receive a digest of posts from The Interpreter via email, enter your email address:

Receive a daily digest ->
Receive a weekly digest ->

Preview   |   Powered by FeedBlitz

Interpreting the Aid Review

This is the archive of a Lowy Institute blog which ran from January to April of 2011. It was published to debate the Gillard Government's independent aid review, which was then in its research and consultation phase. We offer this archive as a service to researchers and the general public.