Missile defence: 'Appeasement'

by Sam Roggeveen - 18 September 2009 11:19AM

Godwin's Law states that, as an online debate grows longer, 'the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1'. In 2006, American blogger Brendan Nyhan proposed a corollary: 'As a foreign policy debate with conservatives grows longer, the probability of a comparison with the appeasement of Nazis or Hitler approaches inevitability.' 

It's only been a matter of hours since President Obama announced the scrapping of the ground-based missile defence sites in Poland and the Czech Republic, and already The Weekly Standard has come to the party: 'As with Chamberlain's appeasement of Hitler, appeasing the Russians is not likely to produce any positive results.'

There are echoes of the Afghanistan debate here: sure, American policy is self-defeating and counter-productive and there is a cheaper option that would achieve the same goals, but reversing our current course would look like weakness. So let's stay the course.

That's my vent out of the way. I'll have a more considered analysis of this move later in the day.

Australia in the Asian Century

An Interpreter feature examining the themes of the Gillard Government’s ‘Australia in the Asian Century’ White Paper. Click here to see every post published in this series.

Email Digest  

To receive a weekly digest of ‘Australia in the Asian Century’ posts from The Interpreter via email, enter your email address:

Receive a weekly digest ->

Preview   |   Powered by FeedBlitz

Selected Interpreter posts also appear in:

 
Business Spectator Caing online The Diplomat
 

Keep up-to-date with The Interpreter through:

iPhone App   iPhone App

RSS Feed   The Interpreter RSS Feed

Email Digest  

To receive a digest of posts from The Interpreter via email, enter your email address:

Receive a daily digest ->
Receive a weekly digest ->

Preview   |   Powered by FeedBlitz

Interpreting the Aid Review

This is the archive of a Lowy Institute blog which ran from January to April of 2011. It was published to debate the Gillard Government's independent aid review, which was then in its research and consultation phase. We offer this archive as a service to researchers and the general public.