Making a statement with ambassadors

by Sam Roggeveen - 9 October 2009 1:05PM

Andrew Sullivan has been on the Obama Administration's case for some time now over its reluctance to back up its election rhetoric on gay rights. That Obama has just named a gay man as America's ambassador to New Zealand does not mollify Sullivan, who wants a more pointed piece of symbolism:

Ronald Reagan also used an ambassadorship to send a symbolic message: he appointed a black man as ambassador to apartheid South Africa. So why not appoint an openly gay ambassador to, say, Jamaica?

(Anti-gay violence is common in Jamaica, with the latest example the murder of a British diplomat.)

I'm a bit of a student of the Reagan presidency but I had no idea he'd done this. I would love to know how the apartheid regime reacted to the appointment. I'd like to think it happened a bit like this:

Australia in the Asian Century

An Interpreter feature examining the themes of the Gillard Government’s ‘Australia in the Asian Century’ White Paper. Click here to see every post published in this series.

Email Digest  

To receive a weekly digest of ‘Australia in the Asian Century’ posts from The Interpreter via email, enter your email address:

Receive a weekly digest ->

Preview   |   Powered by FeedBlitz

Selected Interpreter posts also appear in:

 
Business Spectator Caing online The Diplomat
 

Keep up-to-date with The Interpreter through:

iPhone App   iPhone App

RSS Feed   The Interpreter RSS Feed

Email Digest  

To receive a digest of posts from The Interpreter via email, enter your email address:

Receive a daily digest ->
Receive a weekly digest ->

Preview   |   Powered by FeedBlitz

Interpreting the Aid Review

This is the archive of a Lowy Institute blog which ran from January to April of 2011. It was published to debate the Gillard Government's independent aid review, which was then in its research and consultation phase. We offer this archive as a service to researchers and the general public.