The IMF and Capital Controls

by Stephen Grenville - 18 April 2011 9:05AM

A year ago the IMF recognised that it had been wrong in its doctrinal advocacy of free international capital flows and acknowledged the legitimacy of capital controls, although in very restricted circumstances.

After mulling this for a year, the Fund has now produced two documents which set out their research and their operational framework.

Some form of capital controls (taxes on inflows or prudential measures on the financial sector) are now part of the approved policy tool-kit, although restrictions on capital flows are very specifically down at the very bottom of the tool-box, to be used only when everything else (exchange rate, monetary policy, fiscal policy) has been fully used to deal with excessive capital inflows.

This shift is very timely. For the past decade or so, capital inflows into the emerging countries of East Asia have been strong but not overwhelming, and the reversals during the Global Financial Crisis did only limited damage.

Large inflows were handled by a mixture of reserve accumulation and exchange rate appreciation. But reserves are now more-than-adequate in most of these countries (much more in some cases: equal to the GDP of Hong Kong and Singapore, half of GDP in China, Thailand and Malaysia) and exchange rates have appreciated enough to whittle away export competitiveness.

The IMF analysis sees the flows in terms of temporary surges of capital, but the problem may be more structural. These emerging countries will go on growing much faster than the mature countries. They need higher interest rates to maintain equilibrium.

The on-going interest differential will encourage greater capital flows as financial sectors become more closely linked internationally. The huge financial portfolios in North America and Europe only need to shift their allocation towards these emerging markets by a tiny percentage to create disruptively large inflows.

The IMF has not yet put forward a convincing policy answer to this.

But, having wasted more than a decade in denial about the nature of the problem, the Fund has now made a good start on understanding it.

Photo courtesy of the IMF.

Lowy Institute for International Policy
Australia in the Asian Century

An Interpreter feature which ran from March to September of 2012, published to debate the Gillard Government's 'Australia in the Asian Century' White Paper, then in its research and consultation phase. Click here to see every post published in this series.

For commentary on the published White Paper, click here.

Australia's Defence Challenges

An Interpreter feature exploring Australia's defence challenges as the 2013 Defence White Paper planning process begins. Click here to see every post published in this series.

Selected Interpreter posts also appear in:

 
Business Spectator Caing online The Diplomat
 

Keep up-to-date with The Interpreter through:

iPhone App   iPhone App

RSS Feed   The Interpreter RSS Feed

Email Digest  

To receive a digest of posts from The Interpreter via email, enter your email address:

Receive a daily digest ->
Receive a weekly digest ->

Preview   |   Powered by FeedBlitz

Interpreting the Aid Review

This is the archive of a Lowy Institute blog which ran from January to April of 2011. It was published to debate the Gillard Government's independent aid review, which was then in its research and consultation phase. We offer this archive as a service to researchers and the general public.