IMF maintains tradition of failure

by Stephen Grenville - 22 July 2011 9:29AM

By vigorously-defended tradition, the Europeans get the top slot at the International Monetary Fund and the US gets the second slot – First Deputy Managing Director.

The change-of-guard is now complete. Former French Finance Minister Lagarde, newly-appointed to the Managing Director position, has now proposed David Lipton as her deputy. She describes his qualification as having 'a proven track record in economic crisis management'.

It is a currently-fashionable idea that failure is a necessary prelude to success, and David Lipton certainly fits the first leg of this model. He was the US enforcer in the IMF's negotiations with Korea in 1997, and insisted on the flawed IMF strategy in Indonesia during the Asian Crisis.

Of course, Lipton is in good company in Washington at present. He, Larry Summers (until recently head of President Obama's National Economic Council) and Tim Geithner (now US Treasury Secretary) might usefully swap stories on what they have learned from their mistakes in 1997-8.

Photo by Flickr user Growl Roar.

Australia in the Asian Century

An Interpreter feature examining the themes of the Gillard Government’s ‘Australia in the Asian Century’ White Paper. Click here to see every post published in this series.

Email Digest  

To receive a weekly digest of ‘Australia in the Asian Century’ posts from The Interpreter via email, enter your email address:

Receive a weekly digest ->

Preview   |   Powered by FeedBlitz

Selected Interpreter posts also appear in:

 
Business Spectator Caing online The Diplomat
 

Keep up-to-date with The Interpreter through:

iPhone App   iPhone App

RSS Feed   The Interpreter RSS Feed

Email Digest  

To receive a digest of posts from The Interpreter via email, enter your email address:

Receive a daily digest ->
Receive a weekly digest ->

Preview   |   Powered by FeedBlitz

Interpreting the Aid Review

This is the archive of a Lowy Institute blog which ran from January to April of 2011. It was published to debate the Gillard Government's independent aid review, which was then in its research and consultation phase. We offer this archive as a service to researchers and the general public.