Too much finance?

by Mark Thirlwell - 8 September 2011 2:14PM

In a previous post, I noted that one alternative to asking the question of whether the manufacturing sector in the US was now too small was to ask whether other sectors have grown too large. The financial sector is one obvious candidate — over the last thirty years, the US financial sector has grown some six times faster than US nominal output.

Before the onset of the global financial crisis, many would have found the suggestion that finance was too big an implausible one. After all, the level of a country's financial development seems to be positively correlated with its growth prospects, and there is a large empirical literature investigating the workings of the finance-growth nexus. Then there are all those lovely high-pay, high-skill jobs on offer, which governments both national and local are extremely keen to attract and retain.

In the aftermath of the crisis, however, there has been a greater willingness to ask whether the financial sector may have grown too large in the US and some other developed economies. Certainly, the sheer scale of the financial pollution suffered by the world economy over the past couple of years suggests that our assessment of the relative costs and benefits of the sector merits a rethink, something which would also require that we do a better job of measuring both of these things.

It also requires thinking about whether the large public subsidies implied by government backing for the sector have distorted the structure of at least some developed economies. Indeed, there is now widespread agreement on the proposition that, not only did implicit government support lead to the creation of 'too important to fail' institutions in the run-up to the crisis, with destabilising consequences for risk-taking behaviour, but also that the problem has since grown worse. What is true for individual institutions may also apply to the sector as a whole.

One result of the crisis is going to be a tougher regulatory environment, including requirements for more capital and more liquidity. All else being equal, this will imply some reduction in the size of the financial sector relative to its post-crisis high in countries like the US. Mind you, given uncertainties about some of the trade-offs involved, not to mention the past success of financial lobbyists in shaping the industry's regulatory environment, just how big any reduction will turn out be remains an open question.

Photo courtesy of TaxBrackets.

Lowy Institute for International Policy
Australia in the Asian Century

An Interpreter feature which ran from March to September of 2012, published to debate the Gillard Government's 'Australia in the Asian Century' White Paper, then in its research and consultation phase. Click here to see every post published in this series.

For commentary on the published White Paper, click here.

Australia's Defence Challenges

An Interpreter feature exploring Australia's defence challenges as the 2013 Defence White Paper planning process begins. Click here to see every post published in this series.

Selected Interpreter posts also appear in:

 
Business Spectator Caing online The Diplomat
 

Keep up-to-date with The Interpreter through:

iPhone App   iPhone App

RSS Feed   The Interpreter RSS Feed

Email Digest  

To receive a digest of posts from The Interpreter via email, enter your email address:

Receive a daily digest ->
Receive a weekly digest ->

Preview   |   Powered by FeedBlitz

Interpreting the Aid Review

This is the archive of a Lowy Institute blog which ran from January to April of 2011. It was published to debate the Gillard Government's independent aid review, which was then in its research and consultation phase. We offer this archive as a service to researchers and the general public.