US budget deal and the rise of China

by Hugh White - 16 November 2012 8:35AM

Bob Carr must be pleased, but also a little embarrassed. Bob Zoellick, Republican foreign-policy heavyweight, has used a line from Carr as the peg for a substantial essay in the latest issue of Foreign Policy about the future of American power. Unfortunately, the line was one that Romney used briefly in the presidential campaign to attack Barack Obama, so perhaps he would prefer to see it forgotten now that Obama is safely back in power. I wonder if Hillary and Leon teased him about it at AUSMIN?

But there is another, more substantial reason Carr should wish that the line would be forgotten. What he said is so obviously wrong. Here is the line as Zoellick quotes it:'The United States is one budget deal away from restoring its global pre-eminence.' Carr is saying that the challenge to US global primacy comes from its fiscal problems, and if only the federal budget could be fixed, American leadership would be secure indefinitely.

I think this is clearly wrong. What challenges US primacy is not a fiscal issue but an economic one.

Of course the federal deficit is a major problem for the US, but the challenge, especially in Asia from China, is being driven by a shift in strategic weight, which in turn is driven by a shift in the relative size of the two economies. Compared to this really fundamental change in the distribution of power, America's fiscal problems are relatively insignificant. America would still face a fundamental challenge even if its budget was in healthy surplus.        

No budget deal in Washington can turn around the trends driving the rise of China, because in the end it's not about America. It's about China. Carr's mistake matters because it encourages Americans to think the opposite, which in turn reassures them that they do not have to adjust to the power shift by rethinking their role on the world, and especially their relations with China.

The really worrying thing is that he seems to have convinced Zoellick, for one, that what he said is true. This is what Zoellick’s whole essay is about, and he is among the brightest and most influential of Americans. Of course it helps that Carr's message is something Americans very much want to believe. Which is no doubt why Carr said it.

Photo by Flickr user peregrinari.

Lowy Institute for International Policy
Australia in the Asian Century

An Interpreter feature which ran from March to September of 2012, published to debate the Gillard Government's 'Australia in the Asian Century' White Paper, then in its research and consultation phase. Click here to see every post published in this series.

For commentary on the published White Paper, click here.

Australia's Defence Challenges

An Interpreter feature exploring Australia's defence challenges as the 2013 Defence White Paper planning process begins. Click here to see every post published in this series.

Selected Interpreter posts also appear in:

 
Business Spectator Caing online The Diplomat
 

Keep up-to-date with The Interpreter through:

iPhone App   iPhone App

RSS Feed   The Interpreter RSS Feed

Email Digest  

To receive a digest of posts from The Interpreter via email, enter your email address:

Receive a daily digest ->
Receive a weekly digest ->

Preview   |   Powered by FeedBlitz

Interpreting the Aid Review

This is the archive of a Lowy Institute blog which ran from January to April of 2011. It was published to debate the Gillard Government's independent aid review, which was then in its research and consultation phase. We offer this archive as a service to researchers and the general public.