Reader riposte: Name our defence 'crown jewels'

by Reader riposte - 29 November 2012 10:49AM

Conrad van Coller writes:

The excellent Time.com Battleland blog carried a story yesterday outlining a new report from the Centre for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments which outlines a new plan for US defence planning in the coming 'decades of austerity'. Battleland highlights the four 'crown jewels' - special operations forces, cyberspace capabilities, next generation long-range penetrating surveillance and strike, and survivable undersea warfare systems - CBAS picks out as the military capabilities which should not be subject to budget cuts due to their strategic value.

In the context of the upcoming Defence white paper, I would be interested to see what Interpreter readers consider to be the crown jewels of Australian military capabilities?

Readers can respond via this email address: blogeditor@lowyinstitute.org.

Lowy Institute for International Policy
Australia in the Asian Century

An Interpreter feature which ran from March to September of 2012, published to debate the Gillard Government's 'Australia in the Asian Century' White Paper, then in its research and consultation phase. Click here to see every post published in this series.

For commentary on the published White Paper, click here.

Australia's Defence Challenges

An Interpreter feature exploring Australia's defence challenges as the 2013 Defence White Paper planning process begins. Click here to see every post published in this series.

Selected Interpreter posts also appear in:

 
Business Spectator Caing online The Diplomat
 

Keep up-to-date with The Interpreter through:

iPhone App   iPhone App

RSS Feed   The Interpreter RSS Feed

Email Digest  

To receive a digest of posts from The Interpreter via email, enter your email address:

Receive a daily digest ->
Receive a weekly digest ->

Preview   |   Powered by FeedBlitz

Interpreting the Aid Review

This is the archive of a Lowy Institute blog which ran from January to April of 2011. It was published to debate the Gillard Government's independent aid review, which was then in its research and consultation phase. We offer this archive as a service to researchers and the general public.