The quiet moon

by Morris Jones - 13 December 2012 10:13AM

Morris Jones is an Australian space analyst.

Tomorrow, 14 December, marks another bittersweet anniversary in the history of exploration. It was on that day in 1972 that Apollo 17 astronauts Eugene Cernan and Harrison Schmitt lifted off from the surface of the moon. Since then, no other humans have gone there.

The moon was hot property in the 1960s, as the tensions of the Cold War spilled beyond the surface of the earth. Space was a new strategic frontier, and it was easy (but erroneous) to simply paste long-held concepts of political and strategic geography onto this 'new ocean' and the new lands it held.

The impact of 'Sputnik shock' on the US had also been profound, prompting a panicked rush to accelerate America's development of space technology. Without this injection of paranoia, it is unlikely that the Apollo program that took astronauts to the moon would have been conceived.

The world was enthralled by the landing of Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin in 1969, but quickly lost interest in the subsequent landings. Soon, moon landings would represent a short and glorious blip in the history of the twentieth century.

Why have we not returned to the moon in 40 years? Apart from the tremendous cost and technical capacity required for such missions, we have simply found no suitable return on investment. The moon is a lifeless, barren world. With our current technology, it is unsuitable for mining, farming or colonisation. There is also no value in placing military bases or weapons on the moon, and this is forbidden under international law.

The moon still retains interest to science. Robot spacecraft still make regular visits, and in 2013, China will land a probe there. But until there is a massive change in technology, global needs and geopolitics, it is unlikely humans will return. 

Photo courtesy of Wikipedia.

Lowy Institute for International Policy
Australia in the Asian Century

An Interpreter feature which ran from March to September of 2012, published to debate the Gillard Government's 'Australia in the Asian Century' White Paper, then in its research and consultation phase. Click here to see every post published in this series.

For commentary on the published White Paper, click here.

Australia's Defence Challenges

An Interpreter feature exploring Australia's defence challenges as the 2013 Defence White Paper planning process begins. Click here to see every post published in this series.

Selected Interpreter posts also appear in:

 
Business Spectator Caing online The Diplomat
 

Keep up-to-date with The Interpreter through:

iPhone App   iPhone App

RSS Feed   The Interpreter RSS Feed

Email Digest  

To receive a digest of posts from The Interpreter via email, enter your email address:

Receive a daily digest ->
Receive a weekly digest ->

Preview   |   Powered by FeedBlitz

Interpreting the Aid Review

This is the archive of a Lowy Institute blog which ran from January to April of 2011. It was published to debate the Gillard Government's independent aid review, which was then in its research and consultation phase. We offer this archive as a service to researchers and the general public.